On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a > context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e. the > original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which > combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst > retaining the stability of the courrent code.... That approach sounds good to me. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
