On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 09:35 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:04:52PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > XFS defines a bunch of DMAPI cruft in xfs_mount.h. There is no need
> > for it to be there; move it instead into the xfs_dmapi.h file. A
> > side-effect of this is that "xfs_dmapi.h" now depends on and needs
> > to be #included after "xfs_mount.h" and "xfs_inode.h" (the latter of
> > which itself depends on a "xfs_bmap_btree.h").
> >
> > On the other hand, "xfs_dmapi.h" is #included by a LOT more files
> > than it needs to be, so eliminate those cases.
> >
> > Finally, "xfs_inode.h" defines a type dm_attrs_t that is never
> > referenced anywhere else, so kill it off.
>
> Asserting copyright on removing single include lines seems rather
> interesting..
I simply updated the copyright on every file I touched.
We've been advised that "SGI" is the new description
of the company in copyright statements, so I was just
doing a blanket update.
I'll keep those changes, but will drop the ones where I
actually added a copyright that wasn't there before.
Looks like only one of the 64 files changed fits that
description ("linux-2.6/xfs_quotaops.c").
-Alex
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
