Hi all!
I have come across the following peculiar behavior in XFS and i
would appreciate any information anyone
could provide.
In our lab we have a system that has twelve 500GByte hard disks
(total capacity 6TByte), connected to an
Areca (ARC-1680D-IX-12) SAS storage controller. The disks are configured
as a RAID-0 device. Then I create
a clean XFS filesystem on top of the raid volume, using the whole
capacity. We use this test-setup to measure
performance improvement for a TPC-H experiment. We copy the database
over the clean XFS filesystem using the
cp utility. The database used in our experiments is 56GBytes in size
(data + indices).
The problem is that i have noticed that XFS may - not all times
- split a table over a large disk distance. For
example in one run i have noticed that a file of 13GByte is split over a
4,7TByte distance (I calculate this distance
by subtracting the final block used for the file with the first one. The
two disk blocks values are acquired using the
FIBMAP ioctl).
Is there some reasoning behind this (peculiar) behavior? I
would expect that since the underlying storage is so
large, and the dataset is so small, XFS would try to minimize disk seeks
and thus place the file sequentially in disk.
Furthermore, I understand that there may be some blocks left unused by
XFS between subsequent file blocks used
in order to handle any write appends that may come afterward. But i
wouldn't expect such a large splitting of a single
file.
Any help?
Thanks in advance,
Yannis Klonatos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
