On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:57:35AM -0400, Dan Rosenberg wrote: > I removed the part of the patch dealing with suid/sgid bits - your > reasoning seems good, we clearly don't want to just drop the suid/sgid > bits. ?I was just trying to point out the case where the caller is not > the owner and has write access to the file; since in the ordinary case > writing to that file would result in dropping the suid bit, I thought > this ioctl should try to replicate that behavior. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Alex, can you push it to Linus ASAP? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
