Re: Second 4.6.0 release candidate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marc Aurele La France wrote:
>> Thanks for the link to the thread.  So, I guess the patch submitted by
>> the thread starter was rejected?
>
> Yes, it was.  Kernel headers have been gradually breaking for a _very_
> long time, WRT their #include'ing by userland apps.  Instead of
> changing the kernel build system to monitor the situation, kernel
> hackers have decided re-design /usr/src/linux/include/ from scratch. 
> Last I checked, a first implementation of this rework is scheduled to
> show up in 2.7 kernels.
Gotcha.
> In any case, I am loathe to commit an ever-increasing set of
> workarounds for a problem kernel maintainers not only admit to, but
> also have yet to fix. This whether or not such workarounds are always
> possible, which isn't the case.
Ok, that's cool.  Thanks again for the info.  :)

Peace...

Tom
_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

[Index of Archives]     [X Forum]     [Xorg]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Font Config]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux