Thanks for the tip about this being the wrong list. Do you know if there is an X.org list? In reference to your second question, here's what Im seeing The default screen savers all work great, including a lot of The GL ones. However, these are really really slow... Glgears shows about 25-30fps, Gltext shows about 10-12fps, Gltext(clock) shows about 8-10fps, Glmatrix shows about 2-6fps, Blocktube shows about 5-8fps, Etc, Tux racer runs very smoothly, I would think I would be getting,at a minimum, 30-40fps on any Glapps with the hardware I have this installed on. At least that's what Im basing my comparison on. What do you think? Jesse -----Original Message----- From: xfree86-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xfree86-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Romanick Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:14 PM To: xfree86@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Fedora 3 -new installation GL issues Jesse Nichols wrote: > New to linux, but just installed FC3 on a P3-450, 256mb ram, 40gig HD, > Radeon7000pci card. FC3 uses X.org instead of XFree86, so this is actually the wrong list. :( > The installation went great. Desktop looks great, works fine. > The problem is that all the GL screensavers like GL-gears, etc are > extremely slow. > Tux racer runs great, so there must be some form of gl being used for > rendering. > When I run glxinfo it says > > Direct rendering: yes If glxinfo says you have direct rendering, then all applications should have hardware accelerated rendering. Can you be more specific about the problems you're seeing? _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list XFree86@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list XFree86@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
