On Saturday 31 January 2004 22:22, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > This is a perfectly respectable score for 32bpp. It's actually > exemplary if you're doing it in software. That's about AGP 2x > performance if you're doing it in hardware. *nod*, but that doesn't explain the problems I've been experiencing (taking you back to the beginning of this thread): On my SuSe 8.2 system (radeon 9000), performance of xmame.x11, full screen DGA is very good. If I switch to using a graphics enhancing function (in software), the performance is incredibly bad (never above 20 fps, nomatter which game). On my Morphix cd however, performance is still good when I enhance the graphics. I couldn't find any major differences between the config files, and the version of XFree86 is the same. I posted the scores (which you say are not too bad), because someone asked me for them (hoping they might show some insight into this problem). Anyone have an idea as to why performance under SuSE is so bad when using software graphic enhancing functions while under Morphix it works fine? Regards, Pieter Hulshoff _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list XFree86@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
