Re: In response to - as requested - Epox mainboard Via KM400 Unichrome

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1106 device  
> > 0x7205
> >  VIA  Device unknown
> >  CardVendor 0x1106 card 0x7205 (VIA, Card unknown)
> >   STATUS    0x0230  COMMAND 0x0007
> >   CLASS     0x03 0x00 0x00  REVISION 0x01
> >   BIST      0x00  HEADER 0x00  LATENCY 0x20  CACHE 0x00
> >   BASE0     0xe4000008  addr 0xe4000000  MEM PREFETCHABLE
> >   BASE1     0xe8000000  addr 0xe8000000  MEM
> >   MAX_LAT   0x00  MIN_GNT 0x02  INT_PIN 0x01  INT_LINE 0x0b
> > 
> > 
> > Gena

> This is what is known to the via driver itself:
> 
> via_regs.h:#define PCI_CHIP_CLE3122        0x3122
> via_regs.h:#define PCI_CHIP_CLE3022        0x3022
> via_regs.h:#define PCI_CHIP_VT3205         0x3205
> via_regs.h:#define PCI_CHIP_VT7205         0x7205
> via_regs.h:#define PCI_CHIP_VT3204         0x3204
> via_regs.h:#define PCI_CHIP_VT7204         0x7204
> 
> Luc Verhaegen.

then you do have something like a VT7205.
best guess would be to make the driver belive 
that he is having a 7204 in place of PCI:1.0.00

see "man XF86config", it must be BusID and ChipID settings
that will allow you to forcefully overload the real values.
chances are there to some degree that the old and new chips 
are still compatible to basically work for you with old drivers.

-Alex.
_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

[Index of Archives]     [X Forum]     [Xorg]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Font Config]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux