On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:55:30AM +0200, Kal Cutter Conley wrote: > Hi Saeed, > Thanks for explaining the reasoning behind the special mlx5 queue > numbering with XDP zerocopy. > > We have a process using AF_XDP that also shares the network interface > with other processes on the system. ethtool rx flow classification > rules are used to route the traffic to the appropriate XSK queue > N..(2N-1). The issue is these queues are only valid as long they are > active (as far as I can tell). This means if my AF_XDP process dies > other processes no longer receive ingress traffic routed over queues > N..(2N-1) even though my XDP program is still loaded and would happily > always return XDP_PASS. Other drivers do not have this usability issue > because they use queues that are always valid. Is there a simple > workaround for this issue? It seems to me queues N..(2N-1) should > simply map to 0..(N-1) when they are not active? If your XDP program returns XDP_PASS, the packet should be delivered to the xsk socket. If the application isn't running, where would it go? I do agree that the usability of this can be improved. What if the flow rules are inserted and removed along with queue creatioin/destruction? -- Jonathan
|