On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:31:37 +0800
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fix sparse warning:
>
> net/core/xdp.c:88:6: warning:
> symbol '__mem_id_disconnect' was not declared. Should it be static?
I didn't declare it static as I didn't want it to get inlined. As
during development I was using kprobes to inspect this function. In
the end I added a tracepoint in this function as kprobes was not enough
to capture the state needed.
So, I guess we can declare it static.
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/core/xdp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> index b29d7b5..829377c 100644
> --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> kfree(xa);
> }
>
> -bool __mem_id_disconnect(int id, bool force)
> +static bool __mem_id_disconnect(int id, bool force)
> {
> struct xdp_mem_allocator *xa;
> bool safe_to_remove = true;
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
|