Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> dev_map_free() waits for flush_needed bitmap to be empty in order to
>> ensure all flush operations have completed before freeing its entries.
>> However the corresponding clear_bit() was called before using the
>> entries, so the entries could be used after free.
>>
>> All access to the entries needs to be done before clearing the bit.
>> It seems commit a5e2da6e9787 ("bpf: netdev is never null in
>> __dev_map_flush") accidentally changed the clear_bit() and memory access
>> order.
>>
>> Note that the problem happens only in __dev_map_flush(), not in
>> dev_map_flush_old(). dev_map_flush_old() is called only after nulling
>> out the corresponding netdev_map entry, so dev_map_free() never frees
>> the entry thus no such race happens there.
>>
>> Fixes: a5e2da6e9787 ("bpf: netdev is never null in __dev_map_flush")
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I recently posted a patch[0] that gets rid of the bitmap entirely, so I
> think you can drop this one...
Alternatively, since this entire series should probably go to stable, I
can respin mine on top of it?
-Toke
|