I managed to set up my configuration with a VM on VMware Workstation, and it did not reproduce the bug. I think it was using one of the Intel drivers, though, instead of the generic. Is there a way to force the use of the generic driver? --Zvi On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/30/2017 07:53 PM, Zvi Effron wrote: >> >> I've uploaded the object file to >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-lMs4mJOgQBU090ZzNtSkVnMTQ/view?usp=sharing >> >> uname -a output: Linux localhost.localdomain 4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 #1 >> SMP Thu Aug 17 15:30:20 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ip -V output: ip utility, iproute2-ss170501 >> >> I tried with latest iproute2 built from source (ip -V output: ip >> utility, iproute2-ss170705) and am still having the same issue. (I >> also first noticed this with a custom loader I wrote, so I think the >> loader can probably be ruled out.) >> >> sysctl -a 2> /dev/null | grep bpf output: >> kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0 >> net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 0 >> net.core.bpf_jit_harden = 0 >> net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms = 0 >> >> Thanks for helping look into this! Let me know if you need any more info. > > > Here are my results with your object file; seems to work fine > for me there, good but still strange. ;) I took the actual 4.12.8 > stable kernel. > > # uname -a > Linux linux-2.home 4.12.8 #1 SMP Wed Aug 30 21:27:51 CEST 2017 x86_64 x86_64 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > # ip -V > ip utility, iproute2-ss170705 > # sysctl -a | grep bpf > kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0 > net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 0 > net.core.bpf_jit_harden = 0 > net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms = 0 > # ip link set dev wlp4s0 xdpgeneric obj ./xdp_test_kern.o sec .text > # tc exec bpf dbg # cmd is just finding mount and > dumping trace pipe > Running! Hang up with ^C! > > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 892.116200: : Data start: 90941a Data > end: 909456 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 892.116216: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 893.346855: : Data start: 90801a Data > end: 908044 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 893.346871: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 893.346917: : Data start: 90801a Data > end: 908070 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 893.346921: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 893.654076: : Data start: 90801a Data > end: 908044 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 893.654092: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 901.333823: : Data start: 88dfc1a Data > end: 88dfcb8 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 901.333839: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 907.578693: : Data start: 90801a Data > end: 90804c > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 907.578722: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 908.192621: : Data start: 90801a Data > end: 908044 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 908.192634: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 908.192696: : Data start: 90801a Data > end: 908070 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 908.192701: : Constant: 1 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 908.920655: : Data start: 90801a Data > end: 908044 > irq/131-iwlwifi-710 [003] .... 908.920661: : Constant: 1 > [...] > > I attached the config I used just in case you want to try > building 4.12.8 kernel whether that changes anything. Would > be interesting to see.