Re: [PATCH v2 net-next RFC] Generic XDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:34:56PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:39:35 -0400
> 
> > I also noted that...
> > 
> > xdp1 not parsing the protocol correctly.   All traffic was showing up as
> > protocol '0' instead of '17' in the output.  
> > 
> > xdp2 was not actually sending the frames back out when using this patch.
> > 
> > I'll take a look in a bit and see if I can track these two issues down.
> 
> Read Alexei's earlier posting, he spotted the bugs you are seeing
> here.
> 
> Basically, the MAC header is pulled already so we have to push it back
> before we run XDP over it.  We also have to be similarly careful with
> the MAC header for XDP_TX cases.

Yep, I saw those emails.  I just didn't want to be accused of not running all
the tests.  :-D 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux