Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <CAHashqAZHOJAqF43pRC4fwN-pwp-uWmDxUBCaLUPMoQqeF_OPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170408.200721.109499285021338999.davem@davemloft.net> <CAHashqAZHOJAqF43pRC4fwN-pwp-uWmDxUBCaLUPMoQqeF_OPA@mail.gmail.com>

From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 01:17:26 -0400

> I should be able to run this on Monday and see how the performance
> compares to the driver/native XDP case on some bnxt_en-based hardware.

Thanks in advance for testing Andy.

References:
- [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP
  - From: Andy Gospodarek

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] Generic XDP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Networking Development] [Fedora Linux Users] [Linux SCTP] [DCCP] [Gimp] [Yosemite Campsites]

Powered by Linux