Re: [PATCH 0/2] checkpatch: Add support for Checkpatch-ignore patch footer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 17:20, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think humans should always ignore checkpatch.  It's basically
> worthless.

Do you know of anything better? I guess it's feasible to build
something that's actually good at this job using tree-sitter or
something, maybe it exists. But outside of projects that just enforce
clang-format or whatever, checkpatch.pl is still the best (or perhaps
least bad) thing I've personally experienced.

I won't deny that most error types have only ever presented themselves
to me as noise. But the basic "don't do braces like that" and "you
have a stray space here" stuff has been useful.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux