On 13.12.24 17:14, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Add a few more specific guidelines on handling regressions to the >> kernel's two most prominent guides about contributing to Linux, as >> developers apparently work with quite different interpretations of what >> Linus expects. >> >> Changes like this were asked for during the Maintainers Summit 2024. The >> four rules of thumb spelled out are all closely based on statements >> Linus made there; LWN documented all except "Expedite fixing regressions >> that reached a release deemed for end users.." in their coverage [1]. > > "deemed" used in this way is a bit strange. "intended" perhaps? Yeah, guess that is better. I had trouble finding something short that clearly excludes pre-releases. > That little nit is all I can find to complain about in this one, though > :) Sorry for replying so late and many thx for looking into this series. Will only reply to the stuff where it's worth spending a few more words and pick up the rest of your suggestions without mentioning it to save us all some time. Thx again! Ciao, Thoprsten
