Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:54:49 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On 02.12.24 15:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:56 +0100 > > Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > >> On 02.12.24 11:02, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:57 +0100 > >>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >>> > >>>>> +Tagging people requires permission > >>>>> +---------------------------------- > >>>>> + > >>>>> +Be careful in the addition of tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:, > >>>>> +Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named. > >>>>> +For the three aforementioned ones implicit permission is sufficient if the > >>>>> +person contributed to the Linux kernel using that name and email address > >>>>> +according to the lore archives or the commit history -- and in case of > >>>>> +Reported-by: and Suggested-by: did the reporting or suggestion in public. > >>>>> +Note, bugzilla.kernel.org is a public place in this sense, but email addresses > >>>>> +used there are private; so do not expose them in tags, unless the person used > >>>>> +them in earlier contributions. > >>> > >>> Hmm... There is another tag that we use without requiring explicit permissions: > >>> > >>> Requested-by: > >>> > >>> There are currently 376 occurrences on 6.13-rc1. > >>> > >>> This is used when a maintainer or reviewer publicly requests some changes to > >>> be added on a patch series. > > [...] > > You're basically requesting explicit permission for any "non-official" > > tags as well, including reviewed-by. This is not what it is wanted here. > > Ahh, okay, I see the problem now. But well, I'd say "as all except" in a > text like this implicitly only refers to those the text mentions in the > first place. So I'd say it's good as it is. But if people think this is > a problem, I still think it is problematic, but with the change below: > I could easily use a slightly modified phrase like "...as all > mentioned above except...". It seems a lot better to me. Regards, Mauro
