On 11/18/24 14:23, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:02:29 -0700 Shuah Khan wrote:
Sorry for the delay, the responses to v1 weren't super positive
but I keep thinking this would be very useful :) Or at the very
least I find workflows@ very useful and informative as a maintainer.
Posting as an RFC because we need to create the new ML.
I have to repeat the same thing I said when you sent RFC v1
It is going to add the confusion - people don't cc the one
mailing list we have now.
I am going to have to say no. Sorry.
To me the dissonance between your admission that people don't CC the
current list (IOW status quo isn't great) and the resistance to change
is fairly apparent. But it is obviously your call.
My thinking is that people don't seem to CC the one mailing list
we have and adding one more would add to the problem.
Are there other ways to solve the problem by using prefix like
we do now for subsystem tests: selftests:framework?
thanks,
-- Shuah
