Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] Add AutoFDO support for Clang build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peter,
Thanks for providing the detailed reproduce.
Now I can see the error (after I synced to 6.12.0-rc6, I was using rc5).
I'll look into that and report back.

> I have tested your provided method, but the AutoFDO profile (lld does
not get lto-sample-profile=$pathtoprofile passed)

I see. You also turned on ThinLTO, which I didn't, so the profile was
only used during compilation, not passed to lld.

Thanks,
Han

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 9:31 AM Peter Jung <ptr1337@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> I have tested your provided method, but the AutoFDO profile (lld does
> not get lto-sample-profile=$pathtoprofile passed)  nor Clang as compiler
> gets used.
> Please replace following PKGBUILD and config from linux-mainline with
> the provided one in the gist. The patch is also included there.
>
> https://gist.github.com/ptr1337/c92728bb273f7dbc2817db75eedec9ed
>
> The main change I am doing here, is passing following to the build array
> and replacing "make all":
>
> make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 CLANG_AUTOFDO_PROFILE=${srcdir}/perf.afdo all
>
> When compiling the kernel with makepkg, this results at the packaging to
> following issue and can be reliable reproduced.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 04.11.24 05:50, Han Shen wrote:
> > Hi Peter, thanks for reporting the issue. I am trying to reproduce it
> > in the up-to-date archlinux environment. Below is what I have:
> >    0. pacman -Syu
> >    1. cloned archlinux build files from
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-mainline.git the newest mainline
> > version is 6.12rc5-1.
> >    2. changed the PKGBUILD file to include the patches series
> >    3. changed the "config" to turn on clang autofdo
> >    4. collected afdo profiles
> >    5. MAKEFLAGS="-j48 V=1 LLVM=1 CLANG_AUTOFDO_PROFILE=$(pwd)/perf.afdo" \
> >          makepkg -s --skipinteg --skippgp
> >    6. install and reboot
> > The above steps succeeded.
> > You mentioned the error happens at "module_install", can you instruct
> > me how to execute the "module_install" step?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Han
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 12:53 PM Peter Jung<ptr1337@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02.11.24 20:46, Peter Jung wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 02.11.24 18:51, Rong Xu wrote:
> >>>> Add the build support for using Clang's AutoFDO. Building the kernel
> >>>> with AutoFDO does not reduce the optimization level from the
> >>>> compiler. AutoFDO uses hardware sampling to gather information about
> >>>> the frequency of execution of different code paths within a binary.
> >>>> This information is then used to guide the compiler's optimization
> >>>> decisions, resulting in a more efficient binary. Experiments
> >>>> showed that the kernel can improve up to 10% in latency.
> >>>>
> >>>> The support requires a Clang compiler after LLVM 17. This submission
> >>>> is limited to x86 platforms that support PMU features like LBR on
> >>>> Intel machines and AMD Zen3 BRS. Support for SPE on ARM 1,
> >>>>    and BRBE on ARM 1 is part of planned future work.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is an example workflow for AutoFDO kernel:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Build the kernel on the host machine with LLVM enabled, for example,
> >>>>          $ make menuconfig LLVM=1
> >>>>       Turn on AutoFDO build config:
> >>>>         CONFIG_AUTOFDO_CLANG=y
> >>>>       With a configuration that has LLVM enabled, use the following
> >>>>       command:
> >>>>          scripts/config -e AUTOFDO_CLANG
> >>>>       After getting the config, build with
> >>>>         $ make LLVM=1
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) Install the kernel on the test machine.
> >>>>
> >>>> 3) Run the load tests. The '-c' option in perf specifies the sample
> >>>>      event period. We suggest     using a suitable prime number,
> >>>>      like 500009, for this purpose.
> >>>>      For Intel platforms:
> >>>>         $ perf record -e BR_INST_RETIRED.NEAR_TAKEN:k -a -N -b -c
> >>>> <count> \
> >>>>           -o <perf_file> -- <loadtest>
> >>>>      For AMD platforms:
> >>>>         The supported system are: Zen3 with BRS, or Zen4 with amd_lbr_v2
> >>>>        For Zen3:
> >>>>         $ cat proc/cpuinfo | grep " brs"
> >>>>         For Zen4:
> >>>>         $ cat proc/cpuinfo | grep amd_lbr_v2
> >>>>         $ perf record --pfm-events RETIRED_TAKEN_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS:k
> >>>> -a \
> >>>>           -N -b -c <count> -o <perf_file> -- <loadtest>
> >>>>
> >>>> 4) (Optional) Download the raw perf file to the host machine.
> >>>>
> >>>> 5) To generate an AutoFDO profile, two offline tools are available:
> >>>>      create_llvm_prof and llvm_profgen. The create_llvm_prof tool is part
> >>>>      of the AutoFDO project and can be found on GitHub
> >>>>      (https://github.com/google/autofdo), version v0.30.1 or later. The
> >>>>      llvm_profgen tool is included in the LLVM compiler itself. It's
> >>>>      important to note that the version of llvm_profgen doesn't need to
> >>>>      match the version of Clang. It needs to be the LLVM 19 release or
> >>>>      later, or from the LLVM trunk.
> >>>>         $ llvm-profgen --kernel --binary=<vmlinux> --
> >>>> perfdata=<perf_file> \
> >>>>           -o <profile_file>
> >>>>      or
> >>>>         $ create_llvm_prof --binary=<vmlinux> --profile=<perf_file> \
> >>>>           --format=extbinary --out=<profile_file>
> >>>>
> >>>>      Note that multiple AutoFDO profile files can be merged into one via:
> >>>>         $ llvm-profdata merge -o <profile_file>  <profile_1> ...
> >>>> <profile_n>
> >>>>
> >>>> 6) Rebuild the kernel using the AutoFDO profile file with the same config
> >>>>      as step 1, (Note CONFIG_AUTOFDO_CLANG needs to be enabled):
> >>>>         $ make LLVM=1 CLANG_AUTOFDO_PROFILE=<profile_file>
> >>>>
> >>>> Co-developed-by: Han Shen<shenhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Han Shen<shenhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rong Xu<xur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Suggested-by: Sriraman Tallam<tmsriram@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny<kpszeniczny@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers<ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian<eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Tested-by: Yonghong Song<yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Tested-by: Yabin Cui<yabinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor<nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook<kees@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Tested-by: Peter Jung<ptr1337@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >> The compilations and testing with the "make pacman-pkg" function from
> >> the kernel worked fine.
> >>
> >> One problem I do face:
> >> When I apply a AutoFDO profile together with the PKGBUILD [1] from
> >> archlinux im running into issues at "module_install" at the packaging.
> >>
> >> See following log:
> >> ```
> >> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modinst:125:
> >> /tmp/makepkg/linux-cachyos-rc-autofdo/pkg/linux-cachyos-rc-autofdo/usr/lib/modules/6.12.0-rc5-5-cachyos-rc-autofdo/kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko]
> >> Error 1
> >> make[2]: *** Deleting file
> >> '/tmp/makepkg/linux-cachyos-rc-autofdo/pkg/linux-cachyos-rc-autofdo/usr/lib/modules/6.12.0-rc5-5-cachyos-rc-autofdo/kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko'
> >>     INSTALL
> >> /tmp/makepkg/linux-cachyos-rc-autofdo/pkg/linux-cachyos-rc-autofdo/usr/lib/modules/6.12.0-rc5-5-cachyos-rc-autofdo/kernel/crypto/cryptd.ko
> >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >> ```
> >>
> >>
> >> This can be fixed with removed "INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1" to the passed
> >> parameters of module_install.
> >>
> >> This explicitly only happens, if a profile is passed - otherwise the
> >> packaging works without problems.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Peter Jung
> >>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux