Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Patches for SoCs are expected to be picked up by SoC submaintainers.
> The main SoC maintainers should be addressed only in few cases.
>
> Rewrite the section about maintainer handling to document above
> expectation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> During our LPC ad-hoc BoF, we discussed improving Maintainer SoC docs
> and I think I volunteered to write something. The trouble is that
> whatever I won't write in my notes, escapes my memory.
>
> I believe this is what we discussed. Was there anything more to
> write/document?
>
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Fix missing closing ) (Conor).
> 2. Style changes (in point 3.).
> 3. Soften note that soc@kernel is not for discussing ("is usually not").
> ---
> Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
jon
