On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:15:01 +0100 Simon Horman wrote: > > > We could merge or otherwise rearrange that section with the one proposed by > > > this patch. But I didn't feel it was necessary last week. > > > > Somewhat, we don't push back on correct use of device-managed APIs. > > But converting ancient drivers to be device-managed just to save > > 2 or 3 LoC is pointless churn. Which in my mind falls squarely > > under the new section, the new section is intended for people sending > > trivial patches. > > Thanks, I can try and work with that. Do you want to call out older drivers > too? I was intentionally skipping that for now. But I do agree it should > be mentioned at some point. What is and isn't considered old may be hard to determine. I hope that your existing "not part of other work" phrasing will give us the same effect, as there's usually no other work for old drivers.
