On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 9:38 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 09:28:36AM -0700, Rong Xu wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 11:09 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 11:20:17AM -0700, Rong Xu wrote: > > > > Writing the doc with all these code-blocks was not fun either. > > > > We are happy to change if there is a better way for this. > > > > > > > > -Rong > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 9:13 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 09:11:34AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It makes it absolute crap for all of us who 'render' text documents > > > > > > > using less or vi. > > > > > > > > > > > > "It hurts when I punch myself in the face." > > > > > > > > > > Weirdly enough I have a job that entails staring at text documents in > > > > > text editors all day every day :-) sorry for thinking that's a sane > > > > > thing to do. > > > > > > Something like this should do: > > > > > > > +- For enabling a single file (e.g. foo.o):: > > > > + > > > > + AUTOFDO_PROFILE_foo.o := y > > > > Do you mean we don't use ".. code-block:: " here and just use indented > > text separated with blank lines? > > The double column (::) in the end of a paragraph means that the next paragraph > is a literal block: > > https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/basics.html#literal-blocks > > You'd loose the coloring, but other than that it won't be different from > the ".. code-block::" and easier to read in a text form. Sorry that I did not notice the (::) in your suggestion. This is great. I'll change the docs in this patch to use this method. -Rong > > > -Rong > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Mike.
