On 25/08/2024 13:33, Aryabhatta Dey wrote:
Change 'submiting' to 'submitting', 'famliar' to 'familiar' and
'appared' to 'appeared'.
Signed-off-by: Aryabhatta Dey <aryabhattadey35@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/process/backporting.rst | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/backporting.rst b/Documentation/process/backporting.rst
index e1a6ea0a1e8a..a71480fcf3b4 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/backporting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/backporting.rst
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Once you have the patch in git, you can go ahead and cherry-pick it into
your source tree. Don't forget to cherry-pick with ``-x`` if you want a
written record of where the patch came from!
-Note that if you are submiting a patch for stable, the format is
+Note that if you are submitting a patch for stable, the format is
slightly different; the first line after the subject line needs tobe
There's another one here: "tobe"
either::
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ divergence.
It's important to always identify the commit or commits that caused the
conflict, as otherwise you cannot be confident in the correctness of
your resolution. As an added bonus, especially if the patch is in an
-area you're not that famliar with, the changelogs of these commits will
+area you're not that familiar with, the changelogs of these commits will
often give you the context to understand the code and potential problems
or pitfalls with your conflict resolution.
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ git blame
Another way to find prerequisite commits (albeit only the most recent
one for a given conflict) is to run ``git blame``. In this case, you
need to run it against the parent commit of the patch you are
-cherry-picking and the file where the conflict appared, i.e.::
+cherry-picking and the file where the conflict appeared, i.e.::
git blame <commit>^ -- <path>
Thanks for these fixes.
Reviewed-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx>
Vegard
