On 11.04.24 08:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:50:19AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 11.04.24 08:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:50:29AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> On 11.04.24 07:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:25:05AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # after 4 weeks in mainline >>>>>> + Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # after 6 weeks in a stable mainline release > > So how about changing it to use the "fixed point" reference please? The > phrasing "after -rc3" is probably what most people almost always want > anyway, given the huge churn that -rc1 is. Okay, will go with that phrase in v2; people that want to express "four weeks after the change hit a proper mainline release" (I've seen a few people want something like that to ensure it gets field testing in a real release) can then add a version number to it. Thx! Ciao, Thorsten
