Hello, this small series suggests two (hopefully) improvements for the regressions-related documentation texts. The first one is perhaps unnecessarily nitpicky but if nothing else, it at least adds a missing word. The other one tries to clarify for future readers a question which was on my mind through the whole process during my first attempt at reporting a regression. Please take a look, I am eager to hear what you think. Thank you, kind regards, K. B. Karel Balej (2): docs: *-regressions.rst: unify quoting, add missing word docs: handling-regressions.rst: clarify that "Closes:" tags work too .../admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst | 10 +++--- .../process/handling-regressions.rst | 32 ++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) -- 2.44.0
