Use colon as command terminator everywhere for consistency, even though it's not strictly necessary. That way it will also match regzbot's reference documentation. Link: https://gitlab.com/knurd42/regzbot/-/blob/main/docs/reference.md Reviewed-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst | 2 +- Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst index d8adccdae23f..76b246ecf21b 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The important bits (aka "TL;DR") Linux kernel regression tracking bot "regzbot" track the issue by specifying when the regression started like this:: - #regzbot introduced v5.13..v5.14-rc1 + #regzbot introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1 All the details on Linux kernel regressions relevant for users diff --git a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst index 5d3c3de3f4ec..42b13f77b019 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ The important bits (aka "The TL;DR") is optional, but recommended): * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a line like ``#regzbot - introduced v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions + introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) containing a paragraph like the following, which tells regzbot when the issue started to happen:: - #regzbot ^introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a + #regzbot ^introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a * When forwarding reports from a bug tracker to the regressions list (see above), include a paragraph like the following:: @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ When doing either, consider making the Linux kernel regression tracking bot "regzbot" immediately start tracking the issue: * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a "regzbot command" like - ``#regzbot introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the + ``#regzbot introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) with a paragraph like the following::: #regzbot ^introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1 @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ By using a 'regzbot command' in a direct or indirect reply to the mail with the regression report. These commands need to be in their own paragraph (IOW: they need to be separated from the rest of the mail using blank lines). -One such command is ``#regzbot introduced <version or commit>``, which makes +One such command is ``#regzbot introduced: <version or commit>``, which makes regzbot consider your mail as a regressions report added to the tracking, as -already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced <version or commit>`` is another +already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced: <version or commit>`` is another such command, which makes regzbot consider the parent mail as a report for a regression which it starts to track. -- 2.44.0
