All the examples in the reference documentation for regzbot have a collon after the "introduced" command, while on the kernel documentation some have and others don't. This suggests both are acceptable, but in order to avoid confusion, add collons after all the commands to match the reference docs. Link: https://gitlab.com/knurd42/regzbot/-/blob/main/docs/reference.md Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst | 2 +- Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst index d8adccdae23f..76b246ecf21b 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The important bits (aka "TL;DR") Linux kernel regression tracking bot "regzbot" track the issue by specifying when the regression started like this:: - #regzbot introduced v5.13..v5.14-rc1 + #regzbot introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1 All the details on Linux kernel regressions relevant for users diff --git a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst index 5d3c3de3f4ec..42b13f77b019 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ The important bits (aka "The TL;DR") is optional, but recommended): * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a line like ``#regzbot - introduced v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions + introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) containing a paragraph like the following, which tells regzbot when the issue started to happen:: - #regzbot ^introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a + #regzbot ^introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a * When forwarding reports from a bug tracker to the regressions list (see above), include a paragraph like the following:: @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ When doing either, consider making the Linux kernel regression tracking bot "regzbot" immediately start tracking the issue: * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a "regzbot command" like - ``#regzbot introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the + ``#regzbot introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) with a paragraph like the following::: #regzbot ^introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1 @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ By using a 'regzbot command' in a direct or indirect reply to the mail with the regression report. These commands need to be in their own paragraph (IOW: they need to be separated from the rest of the mail using blank lines). -One such command is ``#regzbot introduced <version or commit>``, which makes +One such command is ``#regzbot introduced: <version or commit>``, which makes regzbot consider your mail as a regressions report added to the tracking, as -already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced <version or commit>`` is another +already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced: <version or commit>`` is another such command, which makes regzbot consider the parent mail as a report for a regression which it starts to track. -- 2.44.0
