On 2/29/24 2:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Of course. You're also welcome to join the #kernelci channel on libera.chat.
Isn't that a bit pointless if it's no the main IM channel ?
It *was* the original channel and still gets some usage (mostly started
by me admittedly since I've never joined slack for a bunch of reasons
that make it hassle), IIRC the Slack was started because there were some
interns who had trouble figuring out IRC and intermittent connectivity
but people seem to have migrated.
In fact it was initially created for the members of the Linux
Foundation project only, which is why registration is moderated
for emails that don't have a domain linked to a member (BTW not
any Google account will just work e.g. @gmail.com is moderated,
only @google.com for Google employees isn't).
And yes IRC is the "least common denominator" chat platform.
Maybe having a bridge between the main Slack channel and IRC
would help.
If the gitlab CI pipeline proposal wants to be considered for inclusion
in the kernel, I think it needs to switch to a free software solution
for its *main* communication channels.
And to clarify, I didn't meant the kernel CI project, but only the
gitlab CI pipeline for the Linux kernel project. I don't know how
tightly integrated the two projects are though.
They're not tightly integrated so far. However, we're exploring the idea of
letting GitLab CI submit jobs to KernelCI and get results as a part of the
pipeline.
Helen already joined the #kernelci channel, and we will maintain a presence
there for the GitLab CI project.
Nick
