On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:19:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 29/11/2023 08:29, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 07:44:22PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> --- > >> +Following order of properties in device nodes is preferred: > >> + > >> +1. compatible > >> +2. reg > >> +3. ranges > >> +4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without > >> + vendor-prefixes) ... > > On point 4, do you have a more explicit way to define what is an actual > > standard/common property? You mention the vendor-prefixes as an example, > > is this just an example or this is the whole definition? > > The actual definition is: defined by common bindings, which are: > meta-schemas and schemas in dtschema, and common bindings per subsystem > (e.g. leds/common.yaml). > > Lack of vendor-prefix is I think 99% accurate in this matter, but there > are some "linux," ones. Got it, thanks! I would suggest to incorporate in some way this additional explanation in v4. Francesco
