Hello Krzysztof,
On 2023-11-25 19:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Document preferred coding style for Devicetree sources (DTS and DTSI),
to bring consistency among all (sub)architectures and ease in reviews.
Cc: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Merging idea: Rob/DT bindings
Changes in v3
=============
1. should->shall (Angelo)
2. Comments // -> /* (Angelo, Michal)
3. Use imaginary example in "Order of Properties in Device Node"
(Angelo)
4. Added paragraphs for three sections with justifications of chosen
style.
5. Allow two style of ordering overrides in board DTS: alphabetically
or
by order of DTSI (Rob).
6. I did not incorporate feedback about, due to lack of consensus and
my
disagreement:
a. SoM being DTS without DTSI in "Organizing DTSI and DTS"
I went through the language of the entire patch, after the notice that
the v4 would no longer accept language improvements. My wording- and
grammar-related suggestions are available inline below.
Changes in v2
=============
1. Hopefully incorporate entire feedback from comments:
a. Fix \ { => / { (Rob)
b. Name: dts-coding-style (Rob)
c. Exceptions for ordering nodes by name for Renesas and pinctrl
(Geert,
Konrad)
d. Ordering properties by common/vendor (Rob)
e. Array entries in <> (Rob)
2. New chapter: Organizing DTSI and DTS
3. Several grammar fixes (missing articles)
Cc: linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-amlogic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: workflows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
.../devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/index.rst | 1 +
2 files changed, 195 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e374bec0f555
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+.. _dtscodingstyle:
+
+=====================================
+Devicetree Sources (DTS) Coding Style
+=====================================
+
+When writing Devicetree Sources (DTS) please observe below guidelines.
They
The sentence above should be replaced with: "The following guidelines
are to be followed when writing Devicetree Source (DTS) files."
+should be considered complementary to any rules expressed already in
Devicetree
+Specification and dtc compiler (including W=1 and W=2 builds).
A definite article ("the") should be added before "Devicetree
Specification" and "dtc". Also, "Specification" in "Devicetree
Specification" should be capitalized.
+
+Individual architectures and sub-architectures can add additional
rules, making
+the style stricter.
"Sub-architectures" should be replaced with "subarchitectures". "Can
add" should be replaced with "can define". "Style" should be replaced
with "coding style".
+
+Naming and Valid Characters
+---------------------------
+
+Devicetree specification allows broader range of characters in node
and
+property names, but for code readability the choice shall be narrowed.
The definite article ("the") should be added before "Devicetree
Specification", and "specification" should be capitalised. As already
suggested, "broader range" should be replaced with "a broad range".
"But for code readability the choice shall be narrowed" should be
replaced with "but this coding style narrows the range down to achieve
better code readability".
+
+1. Node and property names are allowed to use only:
"Are allowed to" should be replaced with "can". After "only", "the
following characters" should be added.
+
+ * lowercase characters: [a-z]
+ * digits: [0-9]
+ * dash: -
List items should be capitalized, i.e. "Lowercase characters" should be
used instead of "lowercase characters", etc.
+
+2. Labels are allowed to use only:
"Are allowed to" should be replaced with "can". After "only", "the
following characters" should be added.
+
+ * lowercase characters: [a-z]
+ * digits: [0-9]
+ * underscore: _
List items should be capitalized, i.e. "Lowercase characters" should be
used instead of "lowercase characters", etc.
+
+3. Unit addresses shall use lowercase hex, without leading zeros
(padding).
"Lowercase hex" should be replaced with "lowercase hexadecimal digits".
+
+4. Hex values in properties, e.g. "reg", shall use lowercase hex. The
address
+ part can be padded with leading zeros.
"Hex values" should be replaced with "Hexadecimal values". "Lowercase
hex" should be replaced with "lowercase hexadecimal digits".
+
+Example::
+
+ gpi_dma2: dma-controller@800000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,sm8550-gpi-dma", "qcom,sm6350-gpi-dma";
+ reg = <0x0 0x00800000 0x0 0x60000>;
+ }
+
+Order of Nodes
+--------------
+
+1. Nodes within any bus, thus using unit addresses for children, shall
be
"Within" should be replaced "on".
+ ordered incrementally by unit address.
Should be replaced with "ordered by unit address in ascending order".
+ Alternatively for some sub-architectures, nodes of the same type
can be
+ grouped together (e.g. all I2C controllers one after another even
if this
+ breaks unit address ordering).
"Sub-architectures" should be replaced with "subarchitectures". The
"(e.g. ...)" form should be replaced with ", e.g. ...".
+
+2. Nodes without unit addresses shall be ordered alpha-numerically by
the node
+ name. For a few types of nodes, they can be ordered by the main
property
+ (e.g. pin configuration states ordered by value of "pins"
property).
"Alpha-numerically" should be replaced with "alphabetically". "Types of
nodes" should be replaced with "node types". The "(e.g. ...)" form
should be replaced with ", e.g. ...".
+
+3. When extending nodes in the board DTS via &label, the entries shall
be
+ ordered either alpha-numerically or by keeping the order from DTSI
(choice
+ depending on sub-architecture).
"Alpha-numerically" should be replaced with "alphabetically".
"Sub-architecture" should be replaced with "subarchitecture". "(Choice
depending on sub-architecture)" should be replaced with ", where the
choice depends on the subarchitecture".
+
+Above ordering rules are easy to enforce during review, reduce chances
of
+conflicts for simultaneous additions (new nodes) to a file and help in
+navigating through the DTS source.
"Above" should be replaced with "The above-described". "(New nodes)"
should be replaced with "of new nodes".
+
+Example::
+
+ /* SoC DTSI */
+
+ / {
+ cpus {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+
+ psci {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+
+ soc@ {
+ dma: dma-controller@10000 {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+
+ clk: clock-controller@80000 {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+ /* Board DTS - alphabetical order */
+
+ &clk {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+
+ &dma {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+
+ /* Board DTS - alternative order, keep as DTSI */
+
+ &dma {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+
+ &clk {
+ /* ... */
+ };
+
+Order of Properties in Device Node
+----------------------------------
+
+Following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:
"Following" should be replaced with "The following".
+
+1. compatible
+2. reg
+3. ranges
+4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g.
without
+ vendor-prefixes)
+5. Vendor-specific properties
+6. status (if applicable)
+7. Child nodes, where each node is preceded with a blank line
+
+The "status" property is by default "okay", thus it can be omitted.
+
+Above order follows approach:
The last sentence should be replaced with "The above-described ordering
follows this approach:".
+
+1. Most important properties start the node: compatible then bus
addressing to
+ match unit address.
+2. Each node will have common properties in similar place.
+3. Status is the last information to annotate that device node is or
is not
+ finished (board resources are needed).
+
+Example::
+
+ /* SoC DTSI */
+
+ device_node: device-class@6789abc {
+ compatible = "vendor,device";
+ reg = <0x0 0x06789abc 0x0 0xa123>;
+ ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x06789abc 0x1000>;
+ #dma-cells = <1>;
+ clocks = <&clock_controller 0>, <&clock_controller 1>;
+ clock-names = "bus", "host";
+ vendor,custom-property = <2>;
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ child_node: child-class@100 {
+ reg = <0x100 0x200>;
+ /* ... */
+ };
+ };
+
+ /* Board DTS */
+
+ &device_node {
+ vdd-supply = <&board_vreg1>;
+ status = "okay";
+ }
+
+Indentation
+-----------
+
+1. Use indentation according to :ref:`codingstyle`.
+2. For arrays spanning across lines, it is preferred to align the
continued
+ entries with opening < from the first line.
+3. Each entry in arrays with multiple cells (e.g. "reg" with two IO
addresses)
+ shall be enclosed in <>.
The "(e.g. ...)" form should be replaced with ", e.g. ...,".
+
+Example::
+
+ thermal-sensor@c271000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,sm8550-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2";
+ reg = <0x0 0x0c271000 0x0 0x1000>,
+ <0x0 0x0c222000 0x0 0x1000>;
+ };
+
+Organizing DTSI and DTS
+-----------------------
+
+The DTSI and DTS files shall be organized in a way representing the
common
+(and re-usable) parts of the hardware. Typically this means
organizing DTSI
The "(and re-usable)" form should be replaced with ", reusable". "The
hardware" should be replaced with "hardware". A comma should be added
after "Typically".
+and DTS files into several files:
+
+1. DTSI with contents of the entire SoC (without nodes for hardware
not present
+ on the SoC).
+2. If applicable: DTSI with common or re-usable parts of the hardware
(e.g.
+ entire System-on-Module).
+3. DTS representing the board.
The "(...)" forms should be replaced with ", ...". Periods at the ends
of list items should be deleted, because those aren't real, complete
sentences.
+
+Hardware components which are present on the board shall be placed in
the
"Which" should be replaced with "that".
+board DTS, not in the SoC or SoM DTSI. A partial exception is a
common
+external reference SoC-input clock, which could be coded as a
fixed-clock in
"SoC-input" should be replaced with "SoC input".
+the SoC DTSI with its frequency provided by each board DTS.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/index.rst
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/index.rst
index d9002a3a0abb..cc1fbdc05657 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/index.rst
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
:maxdepth: 1
ABI
+ dts-coding-style
writing-bindings
writing-schema
submitting-patches
