Hi Bagas,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:20 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 07:43:49PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > Make scripts/checkpatch.pl ensure any added V: fields reference
> > documented test suites only, and output a warning if a change to a
> > subsystem doesn't certify the required test suites were executed,
> > if any.
> >
> > If the test suite description includes a "Command", then checkpatch.pl
> > will output it as the one executing the suite. The command should run
> > with only the kernel tree and the regular developer environment set up.
> > But, at the same time, could simply output instructions for installing
> > any extra dependencies (or pull some automatically). The idea is to
> > get the developer into feedback loop quicker and easier, so they have
> > something to run and iterate on, even if it involves installing some
> > more stuff first. Therefore it's a good idea to add such wrappers to the
> > kernel tree proper and refer to them from the tests.rst.
>
> Does it also apply to trivial patches (e.g. spelling or checkpatch fixes
> as seen on drivers/staging/)?
After having seen the introduction of too many build failures, I'm
inclined to ask for an even stronger proof of testing for "trivial"
fixes for drivers/staging...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
