On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 14:03 +0900, Justin Stitt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:46 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 04:23 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > > > Add the "D:" type which behaves the same as "K:" but will only match > > > content present in a patch file. [] > > > My opinion: Nack. > > > > I think something like this would be better > > as it avoids duplication of K and D content. > > If I understand correctly, this puts the onus on the get_maintainer users > to select the right argument whereas adding "D:", albeit with some > duplicate code, allows maintainers themselves to decide in exactly > which context they receive mail. Maybe, but I doubt it'll be significantly different. > This could all be a moot point, though, as I believe Konstantin > is trying to separate out the whole idea of a patch-sender needing > to specify the recipients of a patch. As I understand it, by using get_maintainer.
