Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: get_maintainer: steer people away from using file paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 11:20, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You are special,

So my mother tells me.

> you presumably use it to find who to report
> regressions to, and who to pull into conversations.

Yes. So what happens is that I get cc'd on bug reports for various
issues, and particularly for oops reports I basically have a function
name to grep for (maybe a pathname if it went through the full
decoding).

I'm NOT interested in having to either remember all people off-hand,
or going through the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

> This tool is primarily used by _developers_ to find _maintainers_.

Well, maybe.

But even if that is true, I don't see why you hate the pathname thing
even for that case. I bet developers use it for that exact same
reason, ie they are modifying a file, and they go "I want to know who
the maintainer for this file is".

I do not understand why you think a patch is somehow magically more
important or relevant than a filename.

               Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux