On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:15:26 +0100 Conor Dooley wrote: > ..I noticed that none of these sections address actually testing the > code they're responsible for on a (semi-)regular basis. Sure, that comes > as part of reviewing the patches for their code, but changes to other > subsystems that a driver/feature maintainer probably would not have been > CCed on may cause problems for the code they maintain. > If we are adding a doc about best-practice for maintainers, I think we > should be encouraging people to test regularly. I think our testing story is too shaky to make that a requirement. Differently put - I was never able to get good upstream testing running when I worked for a vendor myself so I wouldn't know how to draw the lines.
