Re: [PATCH docs] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/07/2023 12:31, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> [CCing other people in the thread]
> How about something like this:
> 
> ```
> Bug reports
> -----------
> 
> Maintainers must ensure severe problems in their code reported to them
> are resolved in a timely manner: security vulnerabilities, regressions,
> compilation errors, data loss, kernel crashes, and bugs of similar scope.
> 
> Maintainers furthermore should respond to reports about other kind of
> bugs as well, if the report is of reasonable quality or indicates a
> problem that might be severe -- especially if they have *Supported*
> status of the codebase in the MAINTAINERS file.

I like mentioning the "Supported" part. We should be a bit more
understanding to all folks who are not paid to do this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux