On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:26:32PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > I still think this version of the sentence is more readable: > > However under no circumstances will patch publication be delayed for > CVE identifier assignment. > > "patch inclusion" is less clear to me that "publication", and "be > delayed to wait for" is redundant: a delay is a wait, and "to arrive" > is just the assignment, which is the subject of the paragraph, so better > to keep the language for that consistent. I agree, I find it better as well :-) Thanks, Willy
