Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Having "how to submit patches" in MAINTAINTERS seems out of place. > > We have a whole section of documentation about it, duplication > > is harmful and a lot of the text looks really out of date. > > > > Sections 1, 2 and 4 look really, really old and not applicable > > to the modern process. > > > > Section 3 is obvious but also we have build bots now. > > > > Section 5 is a bit outdated (diff -u?!). But I like the part > > about factoring out shared code, so add that to process docs. > > > > Section 6 is unnecessary? > > > > Section 7 is covered by more appropriate docs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/process/6.Followthrough.rst | 7 ++ > > MAINTAINERS | 80 +---------------------- > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) > > This has been discussed in the past, I'm not sure why we've never done > it. I totally agree, and will happily apply this unless somebody > objects or beats me to it. It looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
