Hi Randy, On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 08:55:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > It sounds to me like we should just prohibit (not allow) emails that > don't have a To: recipient in them. Also those without subjects, which seem to become increasingly frequent and which used to exclusively be used by spam years ago. > > To reduce ambiguity and eliminate this class of potential (albeit > > tangential) issues, prescribe sending patches 'To' maintainers and > > 'Cc' lists. While we're at it, strengthen the recommendation to use > > scripts/get_maintainer.pl to find patch recipients, and move Andrew > > Morton's callout as the maintainer of last resort to the next > > paragraph for better flow. > > > > I think that is going overboard (too far). As long as a maintainer > is a direct recipient of the email (patch), that should be sufficient. Or it could be simplified, saying that all those who are expected to play a role on the patchset (review, test, merge etc) should be in the 'To' field while those who might possibly be interested in having a look are in 'Cc' (lists, other people having expressed interest in the patchset, single-time contributors to the file being changed etc). It could be hinted that usually people read mails sent to them faster than those they're CCed. This implies that maintainers have to be in To and lists in Cc. regards, Willy
