[resending after finishing the mail for real, accidentally it the keys to send :-/] On 07.01.22 17:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> 'We don't cause regressions' might be the first rule of Linux kernel >> development, but it and other aspects of regressions nevertheless are hardly >> described in the Linux kernel's documentation. The following two patches change >> this by creating a document dedicated to the topic. >> >> The second patch could easily be folded into the first one, but was kept >> separate, as it might be a bit controversial. This also allows the patch >> description to explain some backgrounds for this part of the document. >> Additionally, ACKs and Reviewed-by tags can be collected separately this way. >> >> v2/RFC: >> - a lot of small fixes, most are for spelling mistakes and grammar >> errors/problems pointed out in the review feedback I got so far >> - add ACK for the series from Greg > > My ack seems not to be here :( Huh, how did that happen? Sorry, thx for pointing it out, will be in v3. > Also, this is a "real" series, no need for a RFC anymore, right? I was taken a bit back-and-forth and then settled on calling this one still RFC, as I was unsure if people like Jon and Randy might want to wait on feedback from Linus before they take a closer look at all that huge amount of text... Ciao, Thorsten
