James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 13:16 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:18:14PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Note, there is a second reason why ksummit-discuss is CCed: another > > > reason why I want to create this new list is making it easier to > > > find and track regressions reported to our various mailing lists > > > (often without LKML in CC, as for some subsystems it's seems to be > > > custom to not CC it). > > > > FYI, there will soon be a unified "search all of lore.kernel.org > > regardless of the list/feed source" capability that may make it > > unnecessary to create a separate list for this purpose. There's > > active ongoing work in the public-inbox project to provide parallel > > ways to follow aggregate topics, including query-based subscriptions > > (i.e. "put a thread into my inbox whenever someone mentions my > > favourite file/function/device name"). This work is not complete yet, > > but I have great hopes that it will become available in the next > > little while. Yes, making progress and learning new tricks to make the WWW UI faster :> > > Once we have this ability, we should be able to plug in multiple > > sources beyond just mailing lists, including a feed of all > > bugzilla.kernel.org changes. This should allow someone an easy way to > > query specific bugs and may not require the creation of a separate > > list. > > > > I'm not opposed to the creation of a new list, of course -- just want > > to make sure it's aligned with the improvements we are working to > > make available. > > I suspect the problem is that there's no known useful search string to > find a bug report even given a searchable set of lists, so the main > purpose of this list would be "if it's on here, it's a bug report" and > the triage team can cc additional lists as appropriate. Then we simply > tell everyone to send kernel bugs to this list and ask maintainers to > cc it if a bug report shows up on their list? It seems having "bug" or "regression" in the subject could be sufficient? "s:Regression" or "s:Bug" can be used to query messages reasonably quickly: https://80x24.org/lore/all/?q=s:Bug || https://yhbt.net/lore/all/?q=s:Bug http://rskvuqcfnfizkjg6h5jvovwb3wkikzcwskf54lfpymus6mxrzw67b5ad.onion/all/?q=s:Bug
