Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-11-16 at 09:33 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-11-16 at 16:24 +0800, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > > > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Since kernel will reject max bandwidth being larger than freq_diff in > > > is_valid_reg_rule(), as well reject it ahead. > > > > Not sure that's generally true, if you have AUTO-BW I think it should be > > OK? > > > > Sorry, no, I guess AUTO-BW just lets it expand the bandwidth beyond the > listed, if there are adjacent ranges. Been ages since I looked at this. > I have similar thought as you, but I should admit I have not yet looked into reg.c to know the detail. I quickly check the warning reported by user "kernel: cfg80211: Invalid regulatory domain detected: RS.", and lookup possible cause could be is_valid_reg_rule() to make this patch. I hope original reporter can help to test this, or I will try it when I have free time. > Anyway this probably doesn't fix the user's problem, it just makes it > rejected when compiling already ;-) Honestly these mistakes were made by me. I should fix them. Since rtw89 still use wireless-regdb, I will keep updating the regulatory especially lack of 6GHz frequencies.
