On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 05:06:26PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 10:56:04PM +1000, Adam Nielsen wrote: > > - Update legislation link from March 2022 version to June 2023. > > - Add comments for each frequency range referring back to legislation. > > - Switch units from dBm to mW to match values listed in legislation. > > - Allow 5850-5875 at low power, as this has always been permitted. > > - Combine 5150-5350 bands to permit a 160 MHz channel. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Nielsen <a.nielsen@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Hi all, > > > > Just a few minor changes for AU. I have included (5150 - 5350 @ 160) which > > overlaps two existing bands, however I am not sure if this is the correct way > > to do it. From what I gather, having the two bands listed separately (items > > 61 and 62 in the patch below) would prevent a single 160 MHz channel from > > being spread across both bands. I figure adding another entry that covers > > both frequency ranges (with the most restrictive limitations) would permit > > the 160 MHz channel to be used, however please correct me if this is wrong. > > Unfortunately this does not work. However, with AUTO_BW I believe that > the kernel does allow a larger bandwidth when it spans adjacent > channels, so it probably isn't necessary. > > Otherwise this mostly looks good, but a few changes are needed. I added > comments below. > > > > > I added a bunch of comments pointing back to the relevant section of the > > legislation document as I found it a bit of a challenge to work out where > > each entry mapped back to. So hopefully this will make it easier for the > > next person to work out where the rules are coming from. > > > > If there are any other issues with the patch let me know. > > > > Cheers, > > Adam. > > > > db.txt | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > > index ef4e609..d0b7ec6 100644 > > --- a/db.txt > > +++ b/db.txt > > @@ -124,20 +124,48 @@ country AT: DFS-ETSI > > (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > > > # Source: > > -# https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022C00281 > > +# 'Item' in the comments below refers to each numbered rule found at: > > +# https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2023C00524 > > # Both DFS-ETSI and DFS-FCC are acceptable per AS/NZS 4268 Appendix B. > > # The EIRP for DFS bands can be increased by 3dB if TPC is implemented. > > # In order to allow 80MHz operation between 5650-5730MHz the upper boundary > > # of this more restrictive band has been shifted up by 5MHz from 5725MHz. > > country AU: DFS-ETSI > > - (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (36) > > - (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW > > - (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, DFS > > - (5470 - 5600 @ 80), (27), DFS > > - (5650 - 5730 @ 80), (27), DFS > > - (5730 - 5850 @ 80), (36) > > - (5925 - 6425 @ 160), (24), NO-OUTDOOR > > - (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (43), NO-OUTDOOR > > + # Item 58 > > + (915 - 928 @ 4), (1000 mW) > > + (920 - 928 @ 8), (1000 mW) > > I'm not sure if this is intentionally overlapping, or if 915-928 MHz is > a typo and you meant 915-920 MHz. Either way, we can't have ranges > overlapping like this. > > > + > > + # Item 59 > > + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (4000 mW) > > + > > + # Item 61 > > + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW > > + > > + # Item 62 (200 mW allowed if TPC is used) > > + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, DFS > > + > > + # Combine the above two bands to get a 160 MHz channel. > > + (5150 - 5350 @ 160), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, DFS > > As stated above, this rule needs to be removed. > > > + > > + # Item 63(a) (1000 mW with TPC) > > + (5470 - 5600 @ 80), (500 mW), DFS > > + > > + # Item 63(b) (1000 mW with TPC) > > + # The end is 5725 but we borrow 5 MHz from the following less restrictive band > > + # so we can get an 80 MHz channel. > > + (5650 - 5730 @ 80), (500 mW), DFS > > + > > + # Item 60 > > + (5725 - 5850 @ 80), (4000 mW) > > Please adjust this up to 5730 MHz to not overlap with the rule above it. > > > + > > + # Item 22 > > + (5850 - 5875 @ 40), (25 mW) > > You can't have a rule whose bandwith is greater than the range. And I'd > think you'd want to add AUTO_BW to this and the previous range to allow > use of channel 169, etc. > > > + > > + # Item 63AA (25 mW if outdoors) > > + (5925 - 6425 @ 160), (250 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > > + > > + # Item 65 > > + (57000 - 71000 @ 2160), (20000 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > > I'm surprised at 20W since it also specifies compliance with FCC rules > which as a max EIRP of 10W (though it does give a peak power emission of > 20W). But I guess that's what it says. I never received a response, so I went ahead and applied a version of this patch with the adjustments I noted above. Seth _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
