My apologies, I forgot to CC the mailing list in my previous reply. El jue, 26 de ago. de 2021 a la(s) 09:32, Seth Forshee (sforshee@xxxxxxxxxx) escribió: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:14:09PM -0500, Victor Bayas wrote: > > Update the frequency ranges and power limits according to the current Ecuadorian norm [1], > > corrected 5GHz maximum bandwidth since there are no legal restrictions in this subject. > > > > Note: 60GHz channels 1 to 3 are allowed without license for Point-to-Point links but > > they aren't for Point-to-Multipoint links so they were omitted in this patch. > > > > [1] https://www.arcotel.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NORMA-ESPECTRO-DE-USO-LIBRE-Y-ESPECTRO-PARA-USO-DETERMINADO-EN-BANDAS-LIBRES.pdf > > > > Signed-off-by: Victor Bayas <victorsbayas@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for the patch! A few comments below. > Thank you for your feedback. > > --- > > db.txt | 12 +++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > > index e7b11cf..4630854 100644 > > --- a/db.txt > > +++ b/db.txt > > @@ -504,12 +504,14 @@ country DZ: DFS-JP > > (5250.000 - 5330.000 @ 80.000), (23.00), DFS, AUTO-BW > > (5490.000 - 5670.000 @ 160.000), (23.00), DFS > > > > +# Source: > > +# https://www.arcotel.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NORMA-ESPECTRO-DE-USO-LIBRE-Y-ESPECTRO-PARA-USO-DETERMINADO-EN-BANDAS-LIBRES.pdf > > country EC: DFS-FCC > > - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > > - (5170 - 5250 @ 20), (17) > > - (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (24), DFS > > - (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS > > - (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30) > > + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (1000 mW) > > + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (50 mW), AUTO-BW > > It looks like 5150-5250 MHz also requires DFS. Yes, I tried contacting ARCOTEL without success to get a clarification from them because other countries don't require DFS for 5150-5250 MHz. > > > + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (250 mW), AUTO-BW, DFS > > + (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (250 mW), DFS > > 5250-5350 and 5470-5725 MHz require TPC. Since Linux does not support > TPC the power limits need to be reduced by 3 dBm, which puts them at 125 > mW. Thanks for the heads up, I forgot there was a TPC requirement. > > I also don't see any DFS requirement for 5470-5725 MHz. Section 2.1.6 says that users of 5250 - 5350 MHz and 5470 - 5725 MHz should apply the interference mitigation measures mitigation measures in Recommendation ITU-R M.1652 to ensure compatible behavior with radiodetermination systems. ITU-R M.1652 norm section 1.1 recommends the usage of DFS for 5250 - 5350 MHz and 5470 - 5725 MHz, so I inferred the DFS requirement for 5470 - 5725 MHz as well. https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M.1652-1-201105-I!!PDF-E.pdf Greetings, Victor Bayas. _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
