Hi, Uh, sorry for the delay. > > The first is that it seems I forgot to test build this patch before I > pushed it. The PTMP-ONLY flag isn't allowed by db2fw.py. This was done > by Johannes for reasons which aren't explained, so maybe he can shed > some light on it. The flag doesn't appear to be used by the kernel or > hostapd, so maybe it was deprecated long ago. Anyway, I've pushed a > change to remove this flag. I don't remember, but quite likely we decided it was just not something we could implement properly or so, and never supported it? Sorry. Clearly the kernel does nothing at all with NL80211_RRF_PTMP_ONLY. > The second problem is more serious. I thought that we could allow 160 > MHz bandwidth across two AUTO-BW ranges too small for this bandwidth, > but it turns out that the kernel rejects any rules with a bandwidth > greater than the frequency range of the rule. I'm not sure what we can > do about this. Even if the kernel were changed to support allowing > greater bandwidths across combined ranges, we're going to have a > backwards compatibility problem with older kernels. OTOH, doesn't AUTO-BW basically ignore the max bandwidth for a given range anyway, seeing the code in reg_get_max_bandwidth_from_range()? So just keeping it at 80 with AUTO-BW would still result in 160 being usable? I think? johannes _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
