P.S.: last link should have been https://www.tuv.com/content-media-files/japan/pdfs/1190-telecom-and-radio-for-japan/1190-letter/60ghz2_1_19_4_2_1.pdf On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:00 AM <b.K.il.h.u+tigbuh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This seems to be the page for the previous standard: > https://www.arib.or.jp/english/std_tr/telecommunications/std-t74.html > > And the following should be the new standard, but I don't know where > to obtain it: > https://www.arib.or.jp/english/std_tr/telecommunications/std-t117.html > > The description fields here do note the range of 57-66GHz, though: > https://www.arib.or.jp/kikaku/kikaku_tushin/desc/std-t117.html > https://webstore.arib.or.jp/en/products/detail.php?product_id=288 > > Similar mentions in the news (search for T117): > https://www.arib.or.jp/image/osirase/news/1044.pdf > https://www.arib.or.jp/image/iinkai/kikaku-kaigi/rireki/101.pdf > > Testing procedure is described here, not sure if it's considered useful: > file:///home/bkil/chrome.root/Downloads/60ghz2_1_19_4_2_1.pdf > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:48 PM seth.forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:07:44PM +0800, junping.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Hi Forsheee, > > > The 60GHz band defined for Japan was between 59-66GHz, but is has been Updated to support 57-66Ghz about 2 years ago。 > > > However, the latest wireless-regdb still containning the original regulatory information as below. Please help to check the infomation > > > and update the regulatory.bin. > > > > > > db.txt: > > > ...... > > > country JP: DFS-JP > > > (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > > > (2474 - 2494 @ 20), (20), NO-OFDM > > > (4910 - 4990 @ 40), (23) > > > (5030 - 5090 @ 40), (23) > > > (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (20), AUTO-BW > > > (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW > > > (5490 - 5710 @ 160), (23), DFS > > > # 60 GHz band channels 2-4 at 10mW, > > > # ref: http://www.arib.or.jp/english/html/overview/doc/1-STD-T74v1_1.pdf > > > > The only change which is required to change: > > > > > (59000 - 66000 @ 2160), (10 mW) > > > > to: > > > > (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (10 mW) > > > > Is that right? Can you provide a link to the documentation which > > supports this change? The current link above this rule appears to be > > broken. > > > > Thanks, > > Seth > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wireless-regdb mailing list > > wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb