On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:13:16AM +0200, christian.suenkenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello Seth, > > it looks like you confused mW and dBm in your patch. > Sorry for the late comment, I'm following this list only > occasionally. > > Quoting Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Based on [1] and [2], use of short range devices in this range > > is now permitted in France. Add a rule for this range, using the > > power limit of 25 dBm as specified in these documents and in > > ETSI EN 300 440. > > > > [1] https://www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gsavis/14-1263.pdf > > [2] https://www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gsavis/14-1263.pdf > > The second reference was probably meant to point to: > http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300440/02.01.01_60/en_300440v020101p.pdf Actually it was meant to be http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013D0752&from=EN, but wrong in either case. > > […] > > + # short range devices (ETSI EN 300 440) > > + (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (25) > > This should be (14) or (25 mW). Good catch, it's not that I confused them so much as I just forgot the mW. I'll fix that. Thanks, Seth _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
