Re: wireless-regdb: add Short Range Devices (SRD) for Qatar

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Seth,

Everything looks fine for me...except why you set U-NII-3 band 4 have DFS?
As far as I know the U-NII-3 band 4 doesn't have DFS requirement under
ETSI rules.


Best regards,
Faisal Wiryasantika



On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Seth Forshee
<seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 05:26:12PM +0300, Faisal Wiryasantika wrote:
>> Hello Seth,
>>
>> It's mentioned here:
>> http://www.motc.gov.qa/sites/default/files/qatar_national_frequency_allocation_table_qnfat_0.pdf
>> - page 64.
>
> Okay, so this is what I've come up with based on all the information I
> have:
>
> country QA: DFS-ETSI
>         (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
>         (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
>         (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
>         (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (50 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
>         (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (50 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
>         (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40), NO-OUTDOOR
>
> Explanations for the differences from what you suggested:
>
> - In the letter you provided all ranges are listed as indoor only.
>
> - The power limits you had on some of the ranges were higher than what
>   ware in the letter, so I have reduced them accordingly.
>
> - The letter says "with & without TPC" for some of the power limits, and
>   I'm honestly not sure what is meant by that. So I've cut the limits in
>   half for any ranges which require TPC as per the relevant ETSI
>   standards, since we don't have support for TPC.
>
> Let me know if this looks correct to you, and if so I'll send a patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
>
>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Faisal Wiryasantika
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Seth Forshee
>> <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:21:22PM +0300, Faisal Wiryasantika wrote:
>> >> Dear Seth,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/dbA.txt b/dbB.txt
>> >> index 990abf9..b28e654 100644
>> >> --- a/dbA.txt
>> >> +++ b/dbB.txt
>> >> -country QA: DFS-JP
>> >> -       (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
>> >> -       (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
>> >> +country QA: DFS-ETSI
>> >> +       (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
>> >> +        (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
>> >> +        (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
>> >> +        (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (200 mW), DFS
>> >> +        # Short Range Devices (SRD) (ETSI EN 300 440)
>> >> +        (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR
>> >> +        # 60 GHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567
>> >> +        (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Faisal Wiryasantika
>> >
>> > Thanks for all the information. I'm still a bit hesitant because
>> > documents I find on http://cra.gov.qa/ either do not show these updates
>> > or else they are documents for proposed updates. The letter you supplied
>> > seems to indicate that the changes may have just recently gone into
>> > effect, however I can't find any public information which says the same.
>> > Do you know why the public documents have not yet been updated?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Seth

_______________________________________________
wireless-regdb mailing list
wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux