On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:58:45AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > The frequency ranges have been "rounded down" to conform with the > > apparent convention of only including ranges used by standard 802.11 > > channels, rather than using the actual frequency ranges as has been > > done for some countries (and most 60GHz rules). My preference is the > > latter so that there is a clear correlation between the regdb and > > relevant documentation, and so that the regdb may become useful > > beyond 802.11. With your blessing as maintainer I will also make this > > change to the patch. > > I think that's just an artifact of the original database source and > would also prefer the documented ranges to be used. Yes, I prefer the documented ranges as well. Thanks, Seth
