On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:59:38PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 08/13/2015 04:31 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:29:55PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > >> Resoluci?n 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.: > >> http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf > >> > >> Cc: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> > >> Cc: linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org > >> Cc: wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org > >> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez at gmail.com> > >> --- > >> db.txt | 7 +++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > >> index 982db34..2edbf90 100644 > >> --- a/db.txt > >> +++ b/db.txt > >> @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ country CR: DFS-FCC > >> (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS > >> (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30) > >> > >> +# http://www.mincom.gob.cu/?q=marcoregulatorio > >> +# - Redes Inform?ticas > >> +# Resoluci?n 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz. > >> +country CU: DFS-FCC > >> + (2400 - 2456 @ 40), (200 mW) > >> + (2456 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW) > >> + > > > > Based on the Google translation of the document you linked to, I don't > > see anything which would prevent merging these rules into one rule. Am I > > missing something? > > from http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf > page 7: > > Art?culo 4: Disposiciones de car?cter t?cnico > [..] > 4.3.- No obstante lo anterior, los equipos que operen en las frecuencias entre 2456 y > 2483,5 MHz pueden emplear valores de p.i.r.e superiores, cuando ello se justifique en > beneficio de objetivos de inter?s nacional [...] > 4.4.- Para estos casos es necesario obtener una autorizaci?n expresa de la Agencia > [...] > > If you grant an authorization, for 2456-2483.5 pire can be increased. Okay, but for the purposes of this database that provision isn't going to apply, and it seems you agree since you've listed both as having the exact same power limit. So I'd still prefer that we make it a single rule. Thanks, Seth
