On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:44:19PM +0200, Andrej Vla?i? wrote: > On 15 October 2015 at 20:04, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:31:24PM +0200, Andrej Vlasic wrote: > >> Update frequency allocation rules to mach data from table [1]. > >> > >> Also increase allowed power limit for range 5150-5250 Mhz to 200mW. > >> > >> [1] http://tablice.hakom.hr:8280/vis?lang=en > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrej Vlasic <andrej.vlasic0 at gmail.com> > >> --- > >> db.txt | 14 ++++++++++---- > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > >> index d57ea84..3b36616 100644 > >> --- a/db.txt > >> +++ b/db.txt > >> @@ -504,11 +504,17 @@ country HN: DFS-FCC > >> (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (24), DFS > >> (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) > >> > >> +# Data from table of frequency allocations: http://tablice.hakom.hr:8280/vis?lang=en > >> +# For 5ghz range see http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_85.pdf > >> +# and http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_86.pdf > >> +# and http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_87.pdf > >> +# TPC devices on range 5250-5350 can use 200mW, and 1W on range 5470-5725. > >> + > >> country HR: DFS-ETSI > >> - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > >> - (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (20), AUTO-BW > >> - (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW > >> - (5490 - 5710 @ 160), (27), DFS > >> + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW) > >> + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW > >> + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW > >> + (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS > >> # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 > >> (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > > > In general the changes look okay to me and in line with the published > > regulations (I couldn't read some of the documents you linked to, but > > the limits do look to be in line with ERC/DEC/(01)07 and ECC/DEC/(04)08 > > which are referenced by the frequency allocation table). > > > > It seems pretty arbitrary to change from dBm to mW however, especially > > for those rules whose power limit isn't actually changing. I'd prefer we > > leave them in dBm for consistency, in which case I think we end up with: > > > > country HR: DFS-ETSI > > (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20) > > (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW > > (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW > > (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (27), DFS > > # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 > > (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > > > If that looks fine to you then I can fix it up when I apply the patch. > > It's fine with me too like that. Applied with the discussed changes. Thanks!
